Let me say: I may be biased (I have a huge love for my macro lens), but this is seriously the best food photography lens, or at least “one of” the best lenses.
When capturing food the most exciting thing for me is being able to capture details, and what is better than a macro lens to do it? Well, a 105 mm macro lens!
At first, I was not sure it was the perfect lens for me at this stage, but then…I fell in love and never regretted buying it. Let me explain why.
Cropped sensor or full frame? Result changes.
A premise first: the first thing to consider when buying a new lens – this one as well – is whether you own a cropped sensor or a full frame camera, because results will change.
What does cropped sensor and full frame mean? In simple words, a full frame camera has an image sensor equivalent to a 35 mm film.
Cropped sensor camera instead has smaller image sensors, and the size actually depends on manufacturers. A cropped sensor camera basically “crops out” the middle part of your photo.
My old Nikon D3100, for example, had a crop factor of approximately 1.5. Since I used to take all my photos with a 50 mm 1.8, my lens looked like a 75 mm (50 x 1.5 = 75 mm).
Look at the difference: different camera, same conditions, different results.
Personally I bought my 105 mm knowing I was going to buy a new (full frame) camera a few weeks later, so I did not worry that much. If I had to use a 105 mm macro lens on my D3100 though, it would have looked like a 105 x 1.5 = 150 mm lens (approximately). Nothing wrong with it of course, but there are some great and cheaper lenses that will work as a macro on your APS-C (cropped sensor camera). Speaking of, Rachel by twolovesstudio talks about it on this post > this <
As an example, a 60 mm on my old Nikon would give the same result as a 90 mm on a full frame.
So, consider this factor when adding lenses to your kit.
So, why is this the best food photography lens?
Listen, I know in this moment you are probably thinking “How can you say this is the best food photography lens, Roby? How can you be that sure?”
This is obviously based on my experience, also on my “tastes” and style. If you’ve been following me for a while on Instagram, you know that I only bought the 105 mm about a month and a half ago. However, using this lens every single day, for every single shoot, has been enough for me to determine it.
Number one reason this is (one of) the best lens for this branch of photography, believe it or not: flexibility, or to be precise, versatility.
“Flexible? Really? This is a prime lens, Roby, and it’s macro”.
Well, you’re free to close this window now – thanks for your time though – or believe me.
As I mentioned, I use this lens in every single shoot, both for close-ups (obviously) as well as for wider shots (by moving further from my set).
Let me explain: I own a professional tripod by Manfrotto (linked below) that allows me to take overhead shots using the built-in 90° column mechanism. Despite this, sometimes I feel it’s more convenient for me to raise the column up vertically and simply rotate the head. If I’m using my 50 mm 1.8 though, this means the leg sections are in the frame (unless I lower the central column enough).
Instead, when using my 105 mm this doesn’t happen. See this?
Reason number two? I’m able to capture beautiful details (also the hidden ones) and textures. I mean, look at the example above. Look at those blueberries!
And look at this closeup (and, again, the berries).
The drops here… I go nuts over them!
Number three, as a result of all the features and all the above-mentioned: every single photo makes you feel like you can grab that food and eat it, it makes you feel hungry! Shouldn’t this be the purpose of food photography by any chance? Oh yes it is!
The perfect example? This pasta!
- its sharpness
- the amazing colors
- its robustness (yes, it seems a bit heavy at first, but you’ll get used to it quickly)
- the affordable price (duh) – mine is 105 mm 2.8
- the optical stabilizer (which I personally don’t use because I shoot with a tripod at home)
In conclusion, this lens will be the best for you…
It will be the best food photography lens if:
- You prefer prime lenses over zoom;
- You have a huge love for details (check out my motto here😉) and texture;
- You love closeups but you also love having more elements in the frame;
- You want your food to always be extra appealing and sssexy;
- You’re looking for robustness;
- You love sharpness;
- You currently don’t have a thousand dollars to invest in a lens;
- You love that bokeh effect (!) – this lens has a shallow depth of field;
- You’re looking for versatility.
Wait! One more thing. This lens is not for you if…
Hey, I got to be honest, right? Since all that glitters is not gold, this lens also have “downsides”.
This lens is not for you (unless you can buy more than one lens in one fell swoop) if you are just starting out and don’t have 400/500 $ (or €/£).
Consider investing in another lens first. I started with my kit lens (18-55) a few years ago, then bought a 50 mm 1.8 that I still use it everyday. It’s cheaper but does the job.
Also, it’s not for you if the place where you shoot is very narrow. I don’t have a studio, but I can back off a bit or change room if I want, that’s why I feel it’s versatile. If your space is tiny, maybe this lens won’t be 100% versatile.
My advice? If you’re not 100% sure, rent one and then evaluate the purchase.
WANT THE SIGMA 105 MM 2.8 LENS?
This post is not sponsored by Sigma, but the following are affiliate links which means I make a small commission off of them with no additional cost to you. Thanks for supporting me!
I’m sure you will LOVE this lens, let me know in the comments!
My professional tripod
If you’re looking for a professional tripod, this is the one I’ve been using for a long time.